• Subscribe
  • Is it better to be rich and famous or rich and unknown?

    There are 2 types of people. Those, who share their success without reluctance and everybody "need" to know how much they have šŸ¤‘ or Those, who rather do not talk about money. Even if they make big profits, they prefer to keep them a secret for peace of mind. šŸ¤« Which one are you?

    Replies

    SimonšŸ‹
    Rich and unknown wins - freedom + impact without drama.
    Share
    George Aleesu
    Lancepilot
    Lancepilot
    Launching soon!
    @simonas_kauzonas What are you launching by the way?
    Share
    Gernot Bernkopf
    Rich and unknown for sure.
    Stephen Maden
    Rich and unknown is best šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘
    Share
    Matt Caine
    i think that most people don't like attention - beign famous...but who knows.
    Share
    Konrad S.
    I prefer rich and unknown. But once you're doing something impactful with your money (and what's the point in being rich otherwise?), you'll become somewhat famous necessarily.
    Share
    AnnaHo
    Itā€™s often better to be rich and unknown, as privacy enables a more peaceful life without the challenges of constant public scrutiny.
    Share
    Alex AI
    Honestly, I donā€™t like ā€œflexā€ type posts. I get itā€”many people are intrigued by the money youā€™re making. But personally, Iā€™m not a fan. Two reasons: 1. Thereā€™s no real value in it. Youā€™re not actually helping anyone. 2. It creates security risks. If you have a lot of money and someoneā€™s looking for a target, youā€™re making yourself, your family, and your close ones vulnerableā€”for just a few likes.
    Share
    Michael Oluwatosin
    Rich and unknown is better because you can literally control your life.
    Prince Antonio
    I prefer to be rich and not famous, it feels more comfortable and free from a lot of drama, I don't think it's important to show off the wealth we have.Just enjoy and share some with those in need, that's from my point of view, thank youā˜ŗļø
    Share
    Mohammadreza Gholipour
    I prefer being rich and unknown. It offers the freedom to live authentically without the pressures of public scrutiny. True connections can flourish when youā€™re not in the spotlight. However, given my current age, I find myself wanting to pursue fame and attract more attention. I know that being unknown would lead to a calmer life, but deep down, I desire the recognition that comes with being famous.
    Share
    Rachel Marie Thompson
    Rich and unknown for sure. Fame comes with so many downsides - loss of privacy, constant scrutiny, people trying to take advantage. Being rich gives you the means to make an impact without all the drama and baggage that comes with celebrity. Just my 2 cents!
    Anthony Richard Thompson
    Rich and unknown for sure. Have all the freedom and opportunities wealth provides without the downsides of fame - no paparazzi, no privacy invasion, no public scrutiny of your every move. Can make an impact with philanthropy without all the drama.
    Share
    Sophia Marie Thompson
    Rich and unknown for sure. Fame is overrated - it just brings unnecessary attention and drama. With wealth and anonymity, you have the freedom and resources to make a real impact without all the noise. Plus, you can still live large without everyone knowing your business.
    Vivienne Michaels
    Fam is fleeting, wealth is enduring :)
    Share
    Jacob Henry
    Rich and unknown would be the best option
    Share
    Hassan Khalid
    It's better to be rich and unknown and enjoy your life :)
    Share
    Joan Tub
    Both are 2 different forms of power.
    Share