ChatGPT have the feeling that they are really on the forefront, with every new update. Also 4o and the new research update are really good additions. Sometimes I have the feeling that AI does make mistakes for example in coding, and heard that the new research version makes less mistakes.
@wouter_van_der_meij I’ve heard great things about the research version too, but I haven’t tested it out yet. I want to test how it compares to Perplexity AI in terms of accuracy and performance.
@wouter_van_der_meij@rupal_saini Perplexity isn't perfect either... I find it say the same thing as the question, without fact checking. It's almost like a bug. It works sometimes, and it doesn't at other times. And this is Dec 2024 update.
@piotr_bartoszek, I agree that it’s great for research work, and I rely on it for that purpose as well. But, I find ChatGPT and Claude to be better for generating content.
These days, I mainly use Claude, and when I'm not satisfied with Claude's responses, I use GPT.
Claude's writing ability is excellent. It's incredibly good at Korean.
Also, when asking coding-related questions, Claude's artifacts feature, which GPT doesn't have, is extremely convenient.
@nicolepark, thanks for sharing your experience! I’ve also been using Claude for the past week and I’m pretty impressed by its writing ability—it's truly top-notch.
Just Pick