That's obviously very founder-specific. Many college students might pick a "tarpit" B2C idea out of college because they haven’t yet encountered real-life pain points in their work. B2B often requires more industry knowledge and a deeper understanding of existing problems.
@tonyabracadabra I agree, I often notice that some people really like B2B, while others prefer B2C. That is, the character of the founders influences the choice.
"I prefer the B2B market because it often allows for deeper, more meaningful relationships with customers and provides opportunities for long-term partnerships. In B2B, you can create solutions that truly address the needs of businesses, and the sales cycles, though longer, tend to be more stable. However, I also appreciate the B2C market for its speed and the direct impact it has on consumers. It’s exciting to build products that reach a wide audience and see immediate feedback. Ultimately, I believe in the value of both markets, but my current focus is on B2B because of the potential for building scalable, impactful solutions for businesses."
B2C is a bit harder to develop in the early stages. Customers are too unpredictable, and you can never fully understand their needs and behavior. As a result, some things have to be guessed. However, as they become familiar with the app, they tend to be more forgiving of certain mistakes, unlike businesses.
I prefer B2B because building long term relationships with businesses feels rewarding. It’s like partnering to solve challenges and creating value together
I think it depends on your goals. B2C is great for building personal connections with users, but B2B often allows for larger-scale impact through partnerships. Both have their challenges.
@mogthesify That’s definitely true of large enterprises, but mid-sized and smaller businesses can often move faster. The length of the sales cycle may also be directly related to the cost of the product (more $$ = longer cycle)
I have worked with both B2B and B2C, and I can say that for me there is no fundamental difference, I love them all.
But I note that B2C and B2B for small businesses are very similar, but Enterprise B2B is a completely different universe.
B2B for sure. As the original poster said, B2B requires deeper industry knowledge which I think ultimately leads to solving real pain points that businesses will pay for. Most college kid B2C ideas seem to be shallow copycats or solutions in search of problems. I'd rather build something that provides real value to businesses, even if it's less sexy than chasing the next viral consumer hit.
Most of my time I am in B2C – communication is easier because you can use "emotions" more as arguments.
But B2B can generate more money :D So...
I still somehow like B2C.
B2B is inherently easier to manage because businesses tend to operate more rationally than consumers. Improve efficiency? Great. Reduce costs? Even better. Achieve both? Where do I sign? In contrast, B2C is far more emotional — you’re navigating higher latency and less predictability in decision-making. I agree with the comment from @tonyabracadabra - but would generalize further to say, we build what we know.
Muku.ai