I think that both plans are good but it depends on the perspective.
I would buy monthly just to "test" the product.
If I am satisfied, I do not have a problem to purchase extended version.
I like the flexibility of monthly subscriptions; it's less risky upfront.
But yearly plans are tempting with the discount.
Good customer service and a product I actually use are more important than the subscription type. I'll choose what fits my budget and the value I get.
If the product is new to the market, monthly subscription typically attract more users because of their lower upfront costs and minimal commitment. However, for well-established products, yearly subscriptions often dominate.
To some degree, the concept of subscriptions is built around the idea of earning money from users who pay but either don’t use the product or use it infrequently. As a user, I would prefer to pay only for what I consume and not commit to any subscriptions.
However, as a product manager, my main question is: what can I afford to do? If I can implement a six-month or annual subscription without causing a decline in the user base, I will go for it. This approach allows me to predict revenue and expenses more accurately and ensures smoother business growth.
It's good to have both, but I've also been thinking much more about lifetime subscriptions recently.
It seems like many people have "subscription fatigue." They're tired of paying for things repeatedly. They want to go back to buying something once, then using it forever.
@abhishek_ux I noticed you created a lifetime subscription option for Speech to Note. Brilliant! Are many customers choosing that?