Remote vs in-person meetings: which ones waste more of your time?

Loic Thirion-Lopez
6 replies
Plot twist: Found that my remote meetings are actually MORE efficient. Less small talk, more focus. What's your experience? Has WFH improved your meeting game? 🏠

Replies

Lindsay Davis
Generated Photos
Generated Photos
Same here! I’ve also noticed that in offline meetings, there always needs to be a facilitator to keep the discussion on track. In online meetings, it seems to happen naturally, even without one🤔
Zhiqi Shi
Launching soon!
I prefer face-to-face meetings. However, it's true that they place demands on the person hosting the meeting. If things go off track, they can quickly become ineffective.
Samuel Evans
In my experience, remote meetings tend to be more efficient since there's less chit chat and tangents. But in-person brainstorms can spark creative ideas you might not get virtually. I think a mix is ideal - maybe regular focused remote meetings with occasional in-person sessions for more free-flowing collaboration and team building. Curious what others have found works best!
Feliciana
Same here. Remote meetings feel more streamlined with less small talk and more focus. However, I do miss the organic brainstorming that happens in person. Do you think the focus of remote meetings makes up for that?
Loic Thirion-Lopez
@feliciana_liu I think there must be an in-between, don't you? Remote meeting for efficiency and ad hoc face-to-face meeting for brainstorming and social links.
Feliciana
@loic_thirion_dicte Definitely! A mix of remote for focus and in-person for brainstorming sounds perfect. The energy of being together is hard to beat!